The adults are busy at work, the older children may be out with friends and the younger ones are ‘glued’ to the screen. Not an unfamiliar scene for a family and thus having a sit down family meal can be a rare occasion. Does it matter if we seldom sit down for family meals?

Researchers at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign performed a meta-analysis on 17 published studies examining the relationship between frequency of shared family mealtimes and nutritional health in children and adolescents (Pediatrics, published online May 2011; doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1440). A total of 182,836 children and adolescents (mean sample age: 2.8 – 17.3 years) were studied. Children and adolescents who share ≥ 3 family meals / week are more likely to be of normal weight, have healthier dietary and eating patterns and are less likely to engage in disordered eating. The benefits of sharing ≥ 3 family meals expressed in percentage terms are – the odds for being overweight, eating unhealthy foods and disordered eating are reduced by 12%, 20% and 35%. Moreover the chance of the children and adolescents eating healthy foods is increased by 24%.

Having a sit down family meal provides a focal point for the whole family to slow down and catch up with each other’s activities for the day. Parents can ensure that the children have at least one decent nutritious meal a day. At the table, children get a chance to air their grievances about school and boast about their achievements. Parents can glean a lot of information on a child’s behaviour or mood from his / her interaction at the table. The benefits of a shared family meal are innumerable and known to our ancestors / elders. While we do not need scientific proof of the benefits, the study above certainly helps to remind us about the importance of having family meals.

There has been a steady increase in overweight and obese people worldwide. In 1976, 14.5% of American adults were overweight and obese. By 2003 – 2004, the percentage had increased by almost 5 times to 66.3%! Does weight gain during early adulthood and mid-life adversely impact upon one’s healthy survival beyond 70 years of age?

Researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health and University of Warwick tested their hypothesis that mid-life adiposity is associated with a reduced probability of maintaining an optimal health status among those who survive to 70 or older by using the data in the Nurses’ Health Study (BMJ 2009; 339: b3796). This study involved 121,700 female registered nurses aged 30 – 55 living in one of 11 US states who responded to a questionnaire about history of disease and demographic and lifestyle characteristics every 2 years from 1976 to 2000. Those nurses who survived to age 70 or older and as of age 70 were free from 11 major chronic diseases (cancer, diabetes, myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure, coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), stroke, kidney failure, chronic pulmonary disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), had no major cognitive function impairment, had no major physical functions limitation and had good mental health were termed “healthy survivors”. Nurses who survived to 70 but did not meet these 4 criteria are termed “usual survivors”. There were only 1686 (9.9%) “healthy survivors”.

At baseline, the healthy survivors were healthier, had received more education, a lower prevalence of cigarette smoking and somewhat better diet. In addition, when compared to usual survivors, they were less likely, at baseline, to have overall or central obesity and tended to gain less weight since age 18. The most common chronic diseases were cancer, coronary heart disease (MI and CABG) and diabetes. Increasing BMI at baseline was associated with reduced odds of healthy survival. Every one unit increase of BMI was associated with a 12% reduction of the odds of healthy survival. Compared to stable weight, weight gain since age 18 was significantly associated with reduced odds of healthy survival. For every 1 kg increase of weight since age 18, the odds of healthy survival were decreased by 4 – 6%. Even among non-smokers, compared to lean women (BMI 18.5 – 22.9), women with a BMI of 30 at baseline had 73% lower odds of healthy survival. Compared to women who maintained a stable weight, women who gained 20 kg had 84% lower odds of healthy survival. A higher BMI at 18 also adversely affected the chances of healthy survival. Relative to women with a BMI of 18.5 – 22.9 at age 18, those with a BMI of 23.0 – 24.9 had 15% lower odds of healthy survival and for those with a BMI ≥ 25, it was 33% lower.

The above study would imply that there is no safe period for becoming overweight in our lifetime. It behoves every one of us to stay vigilant about our weight and try to stay lean if we want to enjoy healthy survival at 70 and beyond.

One of the dreaded complications of chronic hepatitis B and C viral infection is the development of liver cirrhosis. As the cirrhosis progress, the hardened liver would no longer be able to sustain life, thus, precipitating the need for a liver transplant. Will the fact that one is under-weight or over-weight at the time of liver transplantation influence patient outcome?

Researchers at the University of Washington examined the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database from 1987 to 2007 in order to determine the morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing liver transplantation at the extremes of the body mass index (BMI). The 73,538 recipients were stratified into 6 BMI categories: underweight (< 18.5 kg/m²), normal weight (18.5 - < 25 kg/m²), overweight (25 - < 30 kg/m²), obese (30 - < 35 kg/m²), severely obese (35 - < 40 kg/m²) and very severely obese (≥ 40 kg/m²). There were 1827 patients in the underweight group, 1447 patients in the very severely obese group and 68,172 patients in the other groups, which became the control (Liver Transpl 2009; 15: 968 – 977). Groups at the extreme ends of BMI (<18.5 and ≥ 40) were compared to control. The analysis showed that underweight patients are more likely to die from haemorrhagic complications and cerebrovascular accidents. The very severely obese patients were more likely to die from infectious complications and cancers. Thus, underweight and very severe obesity were significant predictors of death in those who had liver transplantation.

Is this poorer outcome also evident in other organ transplantation, such as kidney transplantation? Not much information is available for under-weight recipients. What about over-weight recipients? A study from University Hospital of Wales analysed the outcomes of 114 obese kidney recipients, allocated into Group A (BMI 30 – 34.9, moderate obesity) and Group B (BMI ≥ 35, morbid obesity). The 1 year and 5 year patient survival rates in Group A were 98.9% and 95.6% respectively, compared to 87.5% and 79.2% respectively in Group B patients. The degree of obesity also influenced kidney graft survival. The 5 year graft survival rate in Group A was 94.5% compared to only 63% in Group B (Transplant Proc 2008; 40: 3408 – 3412). Morbidly obese kidney recipients have a significantly poorer outcome.

It is easy to become over-weight. It is more difficult to become under-weight. Obesity has become a global health issue and will become a major health problem in the 21^st century. You have a big say in whether you become too fat or just right. Choose wisely!